THE Backlinking Strategy That Works

THE Backlinking Strategy that WorksThis backlinking strategy is modeled after Joseph Archibald’s strategy he generously shared free to the public in his 40 Day Challenge on the Warrior Forum. He was able to rank a fairly competitive niche in the top 5 in Google within 40 days.

(For everyone’s convenience, he has also sinsce published The 40 Day Challenge eBook, which is a lot easier to read than the 1200+ posts on the Warrior Forum. Check out his sample chapter here.)

He’s taken it upon himself to be totally active here on SPI and respond to everyone’s questions and concerns about the backlinking strategy on my blog, which just shows what kind of guy he is. If you use this strategy, be sure to thank Joseph sometime.

***Note: This strategy still works even after Google’s latest Panda Update.

I’ve revealed my niche site backlinking strategy before, but never in this much detail.

Ever since the niche site I created for the Niche Site Duel started to rapidly climb the ranks of Google, eventually landing on the number one position, people have been asking me for more detail about my strategy and the software and tools that I’ve been using to help.

There are several strategies one can use to rank higher in the search engines and the one I’m going to explain is just one of them.

Please note that links to software and tools within this blog post are affiliate links which I do receive financial gain from if purchases are made from them.

Furthermore, the principles of this strategy can be done for absolutely free without having to buy any software or tools. I use the software to help and speed things up.

Don’t spend money on anything you see online unless you can afford it and you feel it will pay you back in the future.

Overview

I’d like to start by sharing an overview of the process with you so you can see how it all works as a whole. Later in this post, I’ll get into detail about the individual parts.

(Click to watch Backlinking Strategy & Process Overview on YouTube)

To summarize what I talk about in the video, the backlinking strategy I’m using involves two layers of backlinks – the anchor layer, which are links that you create which link directly to your niche site, and the indirect layer, which are links that you create which link directly to your anchor layer.

Backlinking Strategy Overview

The Anchor Layer

The anchor layer consists of a few parts, again, which link directly to your niche site.

These include:

  1. Top Article Directory Submissions
  2. New Blogs
  3. Web 2.0 Properties
  4. Links from Blog Blueprint (Blog Blueprint hasn’t been performing as well as it used to. It’s not vital if this part of the strategy is taken out)
  5. Updated 12/03/11 - Direct Links from BuildMyRank (BMR is a BB replacement that has been working much much better for my sites lately! You get 10 links for free, so try it out! Most of the other niche site creators I know use BMR now as well as a primary link resource.)
  6. Updated 3/20/12 – As of this date, BMR articles have apparently been starting to be de-indexed from Google, so creating backlinks using this tool would be a waste of time, at least for now. The best advice is to not use blog networks to drive links back to your site and continue with the other portions of this backlinking strategy, and to diversify the links coming to your site as much as possible.

Later in this post when I talk about how this all happens, I’ll get into what exactly is involved with each of these 4 parts in the anchor layer – what directories I submit to, what “new blogs” is, etc.

The Indirect Layer

The indirect layer is a way to create massive amounts of backlinks which link directly to the anchor properties we setup in the anchor layer. These links do not point directly to your niche site.

The indirect layer consists of:

  1. Mass Article Submissions using Unique Article Wizard
  2. Mass Bookmarking Submissions

The reason that you don’t want to link directly to your niche site is because you’re creating hundreds of backlinks at a time and if you point all of them to your niche site, it will look totally unnatural and your young site won’t be able to handle all of it without raising a red flag. When you point these links to your anchors, because your anchor sites are on high ranking, totally populated websites, they’ll be able to handle the wave/influx of links but at the same time pass or feed that SEO power generated from all of those links into your niche site. Your anchor properties act as a shield while at the same time allow you to get the SEO benefit from the indirect layer.

Yes, I know – it sounds kind of wacky. When I first heard this strategy it really didn’t make sense to me, but after implementing the strategies myself the results are very clear.

The Streamlined Process

Now that you have a general understanding of the what, I’m going to show you the how.

I think the best way to do this is to actually just walk you through the process from start to finish and show you how I can create all of these backlinks from a single unique article.

Step 1: Write an Original Article Related to Your Niche

Everything in this process begins with writing an original article. Personally, I like to have full control of what’s written and what’s published, so I like to write the articles myself, but there are many people who are comfortable with having a virtual assistant or ghostwriter write the article for them instead.

Either way, it should definitely unique content and should typically be around 350-600 words in length. Although the length isn’t extremely important, it’s smart to stay within this range because it will make your life easier in the later steps of this process.

Lastly, you can choose to post this original article onto your niche site before you move on to the next steps. You could kill two birds with one stone by adding content to your site and following the next steps to help build backlinks as well.

Step 2: Prepare The Article for Spinning

Like I mentioned in the overview video above, spinning an article gives you the ability to quickly create multiple variations of an original article so that you can submit them to various places without worrying about duplicate content penalties and so that you can save tons of time by not having to create brand new content from scratch over and over again to get the same message across.

I talked about article spinning in my previous backlinking post and naturally a lot of people commented about it (currently 174 comments) because it is a widely debatable topic.

Not everyone is comfortable with the idea of spinning an article – using multiple variations of an original article and then submitting those variations to several different locations on the web. Some people view it as spammy and others view it as dangerous too. I totally respect that side of the argument, but let me tell you why I think it’s okay.

(I don’t want this post to turn into some huge debate, but I feel I should tell you why I am okay with this method since this is what I’m showing you how to do.)

First, I don’t view it as spammy because I’m making sure that the content that I submit (even after spinning) is good. Since they are quality articles and I don’t submit different versions of an article to the same location, I feel comfortable knowing that I’m doing what I can to make sure my message gets read in the most places as possible, without using the same exact text over and over again.

Also, think about press releases for a second. Press releases are one single version of an article that gets syndicated to tens of thousands of places on the web. Companies like PRWeb make money doing this for other companies, brands and people. As described on PRWeb’s site:

“We send your news to 35,000 journalists and bloggers, 30,000 websites and hundreds of newspapers including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune as well as local news outlets across the USA. PRWeb gets your story where it needs to go.”

Several brand name companies and individuals use press releases (the exact same article, not variations) to help spread the word about something. This is exactly what I’m doing when I submit my spun content to various places on the web, although I’m taking it a step further and am not using the same exact content over and over again. I’m using different variations because that’s the only way I can make it happen, at least without penalty.

In my previous post, I think Mark Mason’s comment says it best:

“I hate this spinning discussion. Let’s say Pat has the cure for cancer and he posts it on his blog. Curing cancer is good. So Pat spins articles about curing cancer and posts them everywhere so he can help the most people while playing by the rules that GOOGLE has set.

So what about security guards? Pat’s site rocks. It will help people that are thinking about becoming a security guard. Security guards are a help to society. It’s all good.

So what if Pat “advertises” his site by placing similar content all over the web? It’s not like the web is “full” and Pat is harming someone by taking up too much space.

It seems acceptable for Toyota to place the same add on every TV network and run it over and over. It’s OK for AP to syndicate their content everywhere. Why not Pat.

Not to mention the fact that Pat is only doing this because Google’s algorithms are too poor to tell good content from bad content. I would argue that if Pat Does not do something to rank his site, he is being unfair to all those readers out therebat NEED him but cannot find him.

Failing to properly promote your site when there are people to help profitably is A lot bigger sin than syndicating 47 very similar but different copies of a good article.

If you want to take a stand against someone, get mad at Google. They have an inferior product that relies on backlinks — yet they make Billions of dollars each year from it. That’s the problem, not Pat.

Anyways, I think we’ve beat this to a pulp already – it’s time to show you how it’s done.

In the video below, you’ll see me using a piece of software called The Best Spinner, which is by far the best spinning software available with the biggest bank of user generated synonyms that make the spinning process much faster.

Although there is a “one-button” approach that you can use to spin your articles, I would advise against using that feature because although The Best Spinner is awesome, it’s automated functions aren’t entirely perfect. You’ll see that I take the time to go through each word one-by-one to plug in good synonyms that make sense. Even though this takes some extra time (and like I said preparing an article for spinning is what takes up most of my time in this backlinking strategy), it’s totally worth it when you can just copy and paste spun versions of your articles in all of the later steps.

(Click to watch The Best Spinner – Article Spinning on YouTube)

Is article spinning absolutely necessary in order to make this strategy work. No!  But as you will see, it does help to speed things up a bit.

Step 3: Submit to Article Directories

In this step, you’ll be submitting spun versions of your original article to various article marketing directories.

The directories I usually submit to are listed below:

You probably know that many of these top article directories check to make sure that the article is unique before approving and posting it onto their site. EzineArticles, especially, is notorious for this, however I’ve never once had an article denied approval or removed. If you are worried, you can still continue through this process by submitting a version to just one of the article directories.

EzineArticles is the top-choice directory, however it usually takes a while to get your articles approved (several days if you have not yet written 10 articles for their site). If you want an immediate approval, you can submit to GoArticles, which helps because then you don’t have to wait days to utilize the article in this backlinking process.

Here is one version of my article that I spun from the spinning video in step #2, live on GoArticles.com. Don’t forget to add a link directly to your niche site in the author bio / resource section, making sure you have at least one link that is an anchor text that matches your target keyword or keyphrase.

And yes, Pete Chamberlain is my pen name for my niche site and all related articles.

Step 4: Create Your New Blogs and Web 2.0 Properties

At this point you can use spun versions of your original article to create new blogs and web 2.0 properties that all have backlinks pointing to your site. They will be a part of the anchor layer that we talked about in the overview, which means they will contain links that point directly back to your niche site.

New Blogs and Web 2.0 Properties

These are new blogs and web 2.0 sites that you create for free, and the real benefit here is that they are a part of a larger, more powerful and higher ranking domain.

So for example, when you create a free blog at WordPress.com, even though the blog you create will start out as a Page Rank 0 (PR0) website, it’s still a part of the PR9 wordpress.com domain. This same ideology goes for all of the articles you’ve written for article directories too.

Each of the new sites will only require one post, which you can grab from a spun version of your original article (although you could and probably should add a little more (spun) content later – just to give the site more meat.

In addition to the content, you should embed a related video from YouTube (and even a picture too) just to make your page a little more relevant to the topic, and so it looks like it’s lived in a little.

Here is where you can create your free blogs and Web 2.0 Sites (thanks to Joseph for the updated list! - updated 2012):

Again, these only require 1 post (2 or 3 is better) with a link back to your niche site, and after that the only thing you have to do with them is remember the URL so you can link to them in the next step (step #5). I don’t do any cross linking between these sites.

Anchor Text Update for 2012: Also, make sure you vary your anchor text a bit. Meaning, the link from these sites that point back to your main site shouldn’t ALWAYS be using your main keyword. Why? Because it’s unnatural and a good variety of related anchor texts is better. So for example, if your target keyword is “Fly Fishing”, then it’s probably smart to use “Fly Fishing” about half the time (roughly) and then a mix of other keywords like “Fly Fishing Rods”, “Fly Fishing Reels”, “Fly Fishing Techniques”, “Fly Fishing Tips”, etc. for the other half.

Notable Web 2.0 Properties

There are two unique Web 2.0 sites I’d like to mention real quick:

They are free to setup and treated in the exact same manner as the New Blogs, they are just setup a little differently. You can use a (HIGHLY UNIQUE) spun version of your original article for some content, you can add an rss feed from your niche site, some videos, some pictures – there are a lot of cool things you can do with Squidoo and Hubpages. Again, just make sure there’s a least one backlink (with your keyword as the anchor text), pointing back to your niche site for each.

Note about Squidoo and Hubpages (and the reason why they’re separated out): More recently, they’ve been getting more and more strict with the content that is posted on their sites. I would actually write the content on these sites manually if possible, but if you don’t have the time you can test a spun version of your original article, knowing that it may not be approved. This is a warning for you just in case, just remember to think about the end user and what’s actually useful for them. The more “modules” and content you can add on those sites – the better, and the link that can come from those sites can be extremely powerful, if you can land ‘em.

After you have all of the above mentioned sites setup, you don’t need to keep creating more. When you get to this point, you can skip step #4 entirely because they will already be in place and doing their job.

Step 5: Indirect Linking to Your Anchor Sites

In this step, you’ll be creating a load of backlinks that link back to your anchor sites that you’ve created from your article submissions, your new blogs and web 2.0 properties.

Unique Article Wizard

Unique Article Wizard is a tool that I got familiar with a month after starting my niche site and it’s proving to work quite well. Previously, I’ve used Automatic Article Submitter to do mass article submissions, but UAW definitely outperforms AAS in my opinion, simply because I can get a lot more backlinks from it.

That being said, UAW isn’t entirely automatic either, but you can get up to 800-1000 backlinks form a single article, with links to prove it, which is awesome. This is why we use these articles to link to our anchor sites, because 1000s of backlinks to your niche site would definitely be a little much.

Here’s a video explaining how UAW works:

(Click to watch Unique Article Wizard – Massive Backlinks on YouTube)

Social Bookmarking

This is another method you can use to link directly to your anchor sites which will ultimately help boost the authority of your niche site.

There are several different backlinking tools available to help you with this process. One of them, Bookmarking Demon, automates the entire process but I’ve found the software to be really hard to handle, and it’s extremely expensive at $147 a pop. After purchasing it myself (again, I purchased and played around with all of these tools to see what works and what doesn’t so I could report back to you), personally I found that it wasn’t worth that much money to me.

I’d rather use a free tool from SocialMarker.com Social Poster, which really isn’t automated at all (and the initial time you run through it it takes a while because you have to manually sign up for all of the different social bookmarking sites), but it does save a little bit of time.

During my journey with my security guard training niche, social bookmarking was the thing I did the least. If I didn’t have unique article wizard on hand, I probably would have done more of it.

Step 6: Rinse and Repeat

Go back to Step 1.

An Important Final Note

So that’s the bulk of the backlinking strategy, and as you can see there are a lot of parts to it.

The thing is, most of the software and tools I’ve been talking about come with a cost, but I don’t want you to think that you need to purchase any of these things in order to succeed.

You can complete this entire backlinking strategy from the article submissions to the creation of new blogs and web 2.0 properties and social bookmarking without spending a dime. So please, don’t feel like you need to empty your wallet after reading this, I just wanted to show you exactly what I was doing and the tools I’ve been using to help save some time and speed things up a bit.

The tools work, but they aren’t necessary.

I know how much influence I have now that the Smart Passive Income Blog has grown so popular, and with that I accept the responsibility to make sure to never cheat you or tell you that you NEED to spend money on this or that in order to find success. When I created my first online business, the only thing I spent money on was a domain name and hosting package.

In the beginning, I didn’t spend money on a fancy website design, search engine optimization, article spinning software, submitter tools or anything like that. Heck, I didn’t even know those things existing and the only thing I did was publish great content, and I eventually gained a following and things just took off from there.

I am anticipating a number of questions or comments from this post, so please be patient for my response while I catch up on some sleep. It’s has been a long night putting all of this together for you, but I love it. If someone asks a question and you know the answer or have something to say, please don’t be shy.

Cheers!

Update: My buddy Eric over at My4HourWorkWeek.com created a really handy excel file to help you keep track of all of the link building and sites that you create for this specific backlinking strategy. Check it out here!

Other Posts in The Niche Site Duel Series

Like what you read?
If so, please join over 25,000 people who receive exclusive weekly online business and blogging tips, and get a FREE COPY of my eBook, eBooks the Smart Way! Just enter your name and email below:
Dan May 16, 2012 at 2:01 pm

Reply

sorry…I forgot one thing which is related to my question regarding the Google Penguin update: I am really interested in the UAW part? Is it still providing some good effects in this strategy? Thanks, Pat

Marc May 17, 2012 at 6:48 am

Reply

Hi all from doing some readings a lot are saying that these techniques won’t work in 2012, that social media is the best.

Are these techniques working?

Helen Whelan May 16, 2012 at 2:42 pm

Reply

I just subscribed to the Unique Article Wizard but found out they’ll only put out 25 articles a day. Oddly, they allow you to set it up in your profile to publish more but then they restrict you to releasing no more than 25 articles a day claiming they don’t know where your articles are going and they don’t want to get penalized by Google.

Fredrik May 19, 2012 at 2:04 am

Reply

Hi guys,

What would you say is the best URL:

http://www.eXXXXXXXXXXX.com
http://www.XXXXXXXXXXX.org

The .org domain match my KW exactly but the .com domain that match exactly are taken and for sale. Haven’t recieved any price yet for the .com, but how would you go about?

Cheers,
Fredrik

Mario May 22, 2012 at 7:30 am

Reply

I would wait to see if the price for the .com is reasonable otherwise I’d buy the .org. Even if the .com was available I would probably register the .org anyway.

Fredrik May 19, 2012 at 2:33 am

Reply

Hi guys,

Which one would you say is the better choice (the XXXX are the exact KW I want to rank on):

http://www.eXXXXXXXXXX.com
http://www.XXXXXXXXXX.org

After reading these amazing posts by Pat (thanks alot for sharing!!!) I’m about to set up my first niche site. The exact KW match on the .com domain is taken and for sale (haven’t recieved the price yet).

So, how would you guys go about this?

Best regards
Fredrik

Tom J Ripley May 28, 2012 at 6:06 pm

Reply

Dont pay silly money for a .com its not worth it. Got with the .org if thats gone then the .com above is ok. Or can you get the phrase with one – in it and .com that would also be ok.

regards

Kevin May 19, 2012 at 3:43 pm

Reply

Thank you everyone for all of your insight. I have been following this blog for a few months now and I have one question on mass article submission (UAW).

Do I create multiple resource boxes to link my spun article to every one of my Web 2.0 sites? Or do I point each article at only one or two of them?

Thanks in advance.

Kevin

nikhil May 21, 2012 at 5:53 am

Reply

And what about if indirect layer which have some bad reputation affect our anchor layer which would ultimately affect our niche.

???? May 22, 2012 at 10:14 am

Reply

thanks

barksmatt May 23, 2012 at 10:48 am

Reply

I’d be interested to know if people think that this approach remains reliable given all the latest algorithm changes. Does anyone have credible/empirical data that shows continued success using this approach?

Tom J Ripley May 28, 2012 at 6:05 pm

Reply

check the thread since april 27th youll find many people reporting good results still

As they should do. Implemented correctly it doesnot trigger a problem. Pat’s site and many otehrs are doing just fine.

Of course good content on the money site and anchor are required. Varied anchor text and limited use fo the EMD in the anchor.

Simon May 24, 2012 at 3:12 am

Reply

Just wanted to give a quick update from my testing… Spining content on web 2.0 sites is not that good anymore. Google got much better on detecting spining content after Penguin update. So, my advice is, if you are not doing AMAZING job at spining (at paragraph level, too) you should post absolutely uniques on web 2.0 blogs – just to get as much value as possible from those links.

Here’s my fresh list of web 2.0 blogs if anyone is looking for one: [justpaste.it/10c9]

Marc May 24, 2012 at 4:45 am

Reply

Hi Simon how would submitting the original unique article that you post on money site… Submitting that same exact article to web 2.0′s?

Steve Wyman May 24, 2012 at 8:56 am

Reply

Hi Marc

I don’t think Marc is suggesting that.

What you need is Unique original content on your money site (website). That must not be replicated anywhere else on the web.

When it comes to the web2.0 you can use highly spun articles based on a new unique article for that purpose.

I hope that helps.

Its true to say that people did take the money site article and sen it to ezine articles etc as well but that’s no longer a good idea.

Tom J Ripley May 28, 2012 at 6:02 pm

Reply

Hi

You dont want to do that. It will create a duplicate content issue

Tom J Ripley May 24, 2012 at 8:53 am

Reply

Hi Simon

Not a lot of folks commenting these days. Just wanted to say thanks for the share.

” post absolutely uniques on web 2″ thats not required. To suggest that ALL web2.0 site should have unique content is pushing it to far. Yes we want decent content on the web2.0 but they are disposable a point missed i think to often.

Were going to be throwing tons of links to them to pass the juice through. Sooner or later that can/will be detected and the web2.0 effected by penguin or panda. So whilst the spinning needs to be very good we don’t need perfect articles. Spin at a high level and THEN manually edit them that’s fine. still quicker that writing original content from scratch.

The content for you money site must be high quality, must be long enough, and it must not be published elsewhere. spend time and effort on it for sure.

If this contradicts any previous advice above or in the thread then its due to the radical changes with the Panda update on the 21st april and then penguin on 24th.

regards

Marc May 30, 2012 at 8:53 am

Reply

Hi Simon I have a couple niche’s I am going to try this on and I have a couple of questions.

Since I have more than one niche do I set up/register separate accounts for each web 2.0 and separate accounts for for submitting my unique original article/s to ezines?

Secondly can I submit the same article without spinning to the web 2.0′s etc?

Marc

Kat Sanders May 24, 2012 at 9:33 pm

Reply

I just wanted to thank you. While I haven’t completed all the steps in your backlinking strategy (I’m still working on getting all my articles up on my site), my site is already on the first page of Google and it has only been a few weeks. Thank you for all the wonderful information.

Ryan May 27, 2012 at 7:36 pm

Reply

Im not sure if this is really still the way to go, I had pretty good luck with this strategy the first time reading it back in 2010, but now i have noticed that a lot of my sites have dropped rankings, or completely lost rankings. I will say that at the time it was really easy money, i focused more on Adsense and the checks that were coming in were outstanding. I am now focusing on just building great content on authority sites rather then building small niche sites (not saying the content before was not great, just not as much and really focused on one keyword).

I actually just cancelled my membership with UAW, which breaks my heart because we had a great run, but I really feel it is a thing of the past. I will say that it is still possible to rank with niche sites, but you will need a lot of content and you need your visitors staying on your site for several minutes to keep your rankings. If you look at Pats security site, he is still ranked number one, but he has a ton of content on that site (i think it was around 120 pages).

I would love to see an updated post for SEO from you pat, because this one worked great but i dont think that it is still the backlinking strategy that works, it is more like the backlinking strategy that worked.

anyways enough with my rant, keep up the great content, and i would love to see more podcast coming out i check at least every other day.

Tom J Ripley May 28, 2012 at 6:01 pm

Reply

Hi

Your jumping to conclusions with NO imperical data.

This strategy doesnot cause the money site to drop in rankings. The highest probability i sthat you sites were hit by the panda and penquin updates in late april.

In genral terms most people that suffered with penquin were using over 70% exact match anchor text from the anchor layer back tothe money site.

This is a bad practice as has been outline din this thread before.

vary you anchor text get rid of bad links and also improve the content of your site. They may then recover potentially.

It still works and will do until google changes the algorithim to zero value links and PR! at which point backlinks will have no value and the whole shooting match will start again.

To assert that its the strategy that worked is to misunderstand offpage SEO in recent times. And if you used UAW extensively back to the money site no wonder you had issues.

SPammy content on your site plus spammy content and backlinks to the anchor is a disaster waiting to happen.

Troy May 28, 2012 at 4:52 am

Reply

I have tryed this for a site and can report that a week out I have got more hits already. Can’t wait to see more results

Malcolm May 28, 2012 at 4:54 am

Reply

This is the same way i have read on a few sites, but it is written so well and easy to follow. Thank you so much for all of your time on this post!!

Taylor Bauman May 28, 2012 at 11:22 am

Reply

Guys,
The whole point of article directories is to syndicate your content. Like the Associated Press. Duplicate content is not syndicated content.

Duplicate content defined as the same content that generally appears on the same URL. It’s deemed malicious if it’s seen done intentionally in order to try to deceive the search bots. I’ve linked to Google’s terms below, check out their own words.

The WHOLE POINT of Ezines is that web publishers search for articles there to then post on their own lists/sites. If they pick and publish your article and must re-produce it exactly. It thus exposes your work to their audience (provided you have the proper links). They need content, you need targeted traffic. You can approach them directly as well. These links have the secondary benefit of providing you high quality, RELEVANT links (i.e. a respected web publication in your niche just published an article with a link yo your home page). We all know a few of these are worth thousands of low PR irrelevant links. PS Ezines articles over 1000 words are much more likely to be picked up by publishers. Any legit publisher with a real following needs to provide real, non-salesy content to their readers.

Even though Ezines itself has a PR 6, your new article page on it will have a PR O.

Your article could and SHOULD appear and be be indexed on your own site first. That way it will be the original. That will protect you. Some worry that an article on a directory will outrank their site on Google. Even if that did happen (which many say doesn’t often) A) it would still have a link to your site and B) either way, if you play this syndication thing right you’d be getting targeted traffic from the relevant publication it appears on anyway. Traffic is traffic.

Ezines and other directories want ORIGINAL content. They didn’t say unique. Note the difference. The same exact article can appear on your site, Ezines, other article directories, blogs and publications in your niche etc. Again–think about why whoever started Ezines started Ezines in the 1st place? Think–what is the point of article directories in the web ecosystem? Providing syndicated content is the original reason that real directories exist (there are many dubious ones that now prey on those who pursue this notion of “article directory marketing” (for links straight from the article directory) rather than article syndication marketing to disseminate content (that also happens to have links–that ultimately end up in real web publications, not just irrelevant low PR article farms run off of servers in Eastern Europe.)
http://ezinearticles.com/editorial-guidelines/guideline/1

From Google. Note the distinction between duplicate content and syndicated:
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66359

Another article:
http://www.wedowebcontent.com/blog/duplicated-vs-syndicated-web-content-after-google-panda.cfm

Taylor Bauman May 28, 2012 at 11:24 am

Reply

PS—you have to keep your author name EXACT as it appears on your site when submitting to Ezines or you will be rejected. When people don’t realize this and get rejected, they then publicize their experience which feeds misconceptions.

Kalille May 30, 2012 at 12:42 pm

Reply

Can someone correct me. For each article submitted to top article directories, do we link back to the main domain of money site or the post/page where we spun the articles from. Do we include the backlink in the post or in the resource box? How many backlinks?

Also, for massive article submission, what anchor text do I use that will link back to the web 2.0s and top article directory links? The main keyword or a variation of main keyword?

Jblake May 30, 2012 at 10:13 pm

Reply

I think this method really works. This is sort of a mini net for your website. Very effective but quite tiring to do. You need more patience to do this but this definitely works for me.

Suzanne June 1, 2012 at 11:09 am

Reply

After reading this post and then watching the video – I’m not sure I understand exactly what you propose as far as creating content. According to EzineArticles and other article re distributors the article you submit cannot contain or resemble posts that you have already on your site. Also one of their stipulations is that you cannot sell items (at least flagrantly) in your article. So I’m curious as to how you would create an article, spin it and then submit it to these “channels”. Especially if they make sure that your content is original by checking your site.

I’m going to go through the article here again and see if I missed something but I do not understand how you are able to get around the stipulations that these channels set forth (even with spinning) unless you write unique content for each hub. That being said when I write or create posts most of them are very informal and usually have tutorials, presets, freebies etc. These items take time to create and I wouldn’t want to make 10 unique posts for other feeds – I would want to make them for my blog. I also do not like just re-listing content others have created (i.e. tutorials, freebies, assets), granted it’s great to help spread the word around but I think that part of branding is creating items that others can use and want.

Any help you can give me to understand more clearly – I would much appreciate.

Dennis June 2, 2012 at 2:50 am

Reply

Suzanne,

Why would you want an article similar to the one on your money site featuring on article directories? You need to write another one.

You create 2 articles on a topic? The best one goes on your money site and the other is for spinning & distribution (syndication).

Furthermore, with the whole ‘unique content’ debacle on your tier 1 web 2.0 sites, I can understand why you would want to create unique content for each property. And ideally you should as it looks more natural. Personally, spinning works for me. I just vary the title and keyword anchor placement for the links (I put the links back to my site in different paragraphs and use different anchors because no matter how well you spin the article, if the link back to your site is ALWAYS showing up on paragraph 4, sentence 6 of the article with the anchor ‘cheap used laptops’, that’s a footprint).

Also, why are you against publishing.. or ‘relisting as you call it’ (look at the massively popular engadget.com)?? I mean, you don’t have to re-list stuff on your money site if you don’t want to but you’re doing your readers a disservice because truth be told, they could well benefit from reading other people’s perspective on whatever topic your site is about.

Also, why couldn’t you re-list other peoples content on your web 2.0 sites since you are so concerned about the time it takes to create unique content for each one? Remember what these web 2.0 links are for – it’s easy to forget. They are purely for LINKS. Strong LINKS back to your main site. You aren’t so concerned about people coming across them.

All you need to do is scour the web for a good article related to your topic. You then reblog it and put a few comments in there and then you drop a link back to your site (be sure to credit the source with a link back). It’s an easy way to populate your web 2.0s with content WITHOUT having to create 100% unique stuff.

I’d personally start with 10 blog style web 2.0 properties and manage 2 a day. You just find stuff to re-blog and populate them with content and then put a few of your own comments and drop your link(s) back to your money site. The INTRODUCTION needs to be unique aswell. The structure is like so:

1. paragraph of unique stuff in the intro i..e hey, I found this cool article about blah blah blah.. (drop anchor text link)

2. drop a snippet of the article and put a no follow link to ‘read more’ to the source

3. write your thoughts on it at the end. (drop url link to your site).

You can then hit the web 2.0 properties with UAW or cheap fiverr blasts.. whatever you choose.

Marc June 2, 2012 at 3:23 am

Reply

Hi Dennis there are are schools of thought on this pertaining to content on web 2.0 hubs.

I am looking into a strategy using posterous which allows you to add web 2.0′s and the likes of Wordpress.com. You post duplicate content to all your web 2.0′s etc via posterous because posterous allows you to post to the hubs all at once. However in each web 2.0 you have anchor text pointing to money site.

John June 1, 2012 at 8:03 pm

Reply

Hi Pat,

NEED HELP! I don’t know if this was already been answered in the comments, but I just like to clarify the social bookmarking part.

What URL’s should I bookmark, is it the URL’s from the mass article submissions OR the URL’s of the articles from my money site? Thank you for this great post by the way. Cheers!

Rommel June 1, 2012 at 8:09 pm

Reply

Thanks Pat for really taking the time to go through the steps in detail, coz it get’s kinda confusing unless it’s shown to you. I’ve being reading your blogs for a couple of months now but this is the first time I’ve actually explored the rest of your site! lol So much resources =)

JB June 1, 2012 at 11:24 pm

Reply

Pat, let’s say I spin my original article 10 times, do I also have to change the original title 10 times or can I keep the original title for all the spinned articles. Also can I use the same bio at the end of the original article for all the spinned articles or do also have to change it for each spinned article.

Joseph Archibald November 28, 2010 at 2:48 am

Reply

Hi Ian, so basically you are saying that you may add in spun links in your UAW bios so that these are chosen at random as the articles are submitted? Kinda like this for example:
best cat food|top cat food|best quality cat food…

This way is very effective, yes. Its entirely up to you how you go about this process Ian – you’ll get similar results no matter which method you choose to work with.

Regards
Joseph

Ian Tomlinson November 28, 2010 at 2:55 am

Reply

Thanks for replying again Jo. Your answer helps loads. Can I ask another question please? Since attempting to increase my website rank my site has been jumping all over SERPs for my targetted keywords. One day I’m at number 5, a week later I go to 235, then back to 40, then down again etc etc – is this normal? When will it even out?
I’m using Market samurai (bought through your link pat ;) ) to measure my rank and instead of using blog blurpint Im using BuildMyRank that is trickling out 1-3 articles a day using about 5 different Keywords – each KW targetting a separate page of my site.
Thanks once more for the guidance
Confused – Ian

Joseph Archibald November 28, 2010 at 3:09 am

Reply

Hi Ian, that’s a hell of a lot of dancing!

Build My Rank is my preference over Blog Blueprint so you’re ahead of the game there Ian! BB is good, but BMR that little better in some ways, but not necessarily suited to everyone by any means – BB is much less laborious, unless of course you are outsourcing the BMR content creation.

And a note to anyone who wants to sign up for BMR now – its just risen in price from $59 a month to a whopping $129 a month, so you would have to be seriously committed to using it religiously or its money down the drain in my opinion.

To get back to the agenda however – have you been using UAW in tandem with BMR, and if so, how many UAW articles are you submitting each day to this particular site?

Or – is this dance caused purely by the BMR links – have you been utilizing any other form of linking recently?

Regards
Joseph

Ian Tomlinson November 28, 2010 at 6:16 am

Reply

Hi Jo
The dancing seems to be caused by BMR as I have only just started with this strategy outlined by Pat in this article (your originally I think?) I have only just started using UAW and I’m only targetting the anchor layer – as per instructions. The dancing is wierd. A couple of days ago I was fith for a keyword in google, now I’m somewhere at the bottom of page 3! Go figure! Is this normal?

Joseph Archibald November 28, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Reply

Hi Ian, this dancing is not toally unuusual if its the first set of links to the site. But because these sort of links are powerful – both BMR and BB links can have your site dancing dramatically or even sandboxed, merely from a few links here and there. That is somewhat dependent on the website content too, I would tend to believe, and not just about the actual backlinks.

I sense that you are gonna have to ride with the waves here Ian. So keep on keepin’ on and hopefully it will settle in the short term rather than the longer term. In fact, I like the sound of that – being 5th and now at the bottom of page 3. If I saw my webpages dancing like this I’d be excited because it sounds like you are gonna come back higher up than 5th. Personally I love to dance with Google, but occasionally that dance never stops. Let’s hope that the dance your having with them is merely temporary.

Regards
Joseph

Ian Tomlinson November 28, 2010 at 2:15 pm

Reply

Thanks so much for the help with this Joseph, I’m hoping that using BMR and the strategy so brilliantly laid out here by Pat will slow the dance down and get me to no.1 for my keywords! You have both been very helpful and I appreciate it tremendously – thanks :)

Joseph Archibald November 28, 2010 at 2:48 pm

Reply

Hi Ian, yup – Pat did a super job of laying out the strategy in a much more brief format than my own efforts on the Warrior Forum, lol!

If this does not get your chosen kwd phrases to top spot in Google, then you will be very close – no doubt about it (depending on your choice in kwds of course – real high end niches are simply too competitive these days and it would take many months, if not years to be competing in those niches).

Best wishes with this Ian!

Regards
Joseph

Brad December 18, 2010 at 3:46 pm

Reply

Just found that BMR is currently closed for new members. Looks like the significant price increase was not enough to stem the flow of new customers!

Joseph Archibald March 17, 2011 at 11:48 pm

Reply

Hey Rob, perhaps you should open up commenting on your blog(?). I was going to leave a comment on your fine post.

Best wishes with your progress!

Joseph

Gregory C. August 21, 2011 at 12:13 pm

Reply

Thanks for the initial process however! This is a guide I will come back to again and again.

stevewyman November 29, 2011 at 10:47 am

Reply

Hey Jo

Does that mean you going to do a new addition of your eBook that this is all based on anyway :-)

theres a lot missing rom this run through thats in the original WSo and you ebook.

Hence so many questions :-)

great work Jo

Steve

Kris Pashek December 3, 2011 at 3:34 am

Reply

Hi Joseph.
I’m wondering what do you think about 2 things:
- phrase match anchor text – meaning that backlinks to site contain not only our main KW but also some part of backlinks contant also phrases like “click here”
- do you think that having also NO-follow links have impact on rankings?

Regards

Kris

Blake G. September 26, 2011 at 4:45 pm

Reply

Just an update to Brad’s post … They are accepting new members again!

Blake

Ochena Bikel December 13, 2011 at 12:45 pm

Reply

I agree with U… I need to know the same thing

Joseph Archibald January 3, 2012 at 10:53 pm

Reply

Hi Kris Pashek, I do apologise as I never saw your comment and never realized it was directed at me. Nevertheless, better reply late than never at all, even though I’m a whole month late ;-)

1. I like the “click here” anchor text idea, and I also like the variations on website URL anchor text idea – these appear to be “natural” ways to bookmark a site, thus should be incorporated into a backlinking strategy. For variations on website URL I mean this sorta thing… Say your domain was http://ragdollcatsforsale.com

Variations would be…
http://ragdollcatsforsale.com
http://www.ragdollcatsforsale.com
http://www.ragdollcatsforsale.com
ragdollcatsforsale.com

I would always want to use No-Follow links in an SEO campaign. How much value they actually have in terms of aiding our rankings is debatable, but they are necessary to mix things up. Further, I sense they actually have more value than what most of us believe they do – in Google, in Bing and possibly in Yahoo too.

Kind regards
Joseph

Andre Garde December 15, 2011 at 5:54 pm

Reply

$129? BMR’s pricing page still lists it as $59/month per 5 domains.

TOM December 24, 2011 at 10:01 am

Reply

whats with the spammers providing no value and getting links in.

Isnt it about time you invested back into the community PAT thats if you even read this anymore.

It annoys me all these unanswered questions and spamming being allowed. Its making it more difficult to se whats happening in the thread.

So you still suport the use of UAW as a method build backlinks to the anchor layer !!! You have really found nothing better

If you can be bothered why not emplyee a VA its not like this blog cant afford it?

And whats with the spammer button when it doesnot stop spammers
theres a great video on first adopters that youd do well to look at. dont forget your first and second adopters

Sorry to rant but come on dude pull it up.. its your rep on the line.

Happy christmas and have a fantastic 2012

Pat December 24, 2011 at 10:30 am

Reply

Tom, I’m taking a few days off to enjoy time with my family, so I apologize I haven’t been able to deal with these spammers right away. Every other time, I’ve come in here and deleted them right away.

I get upwards of 150+ emails a day from people, and I respond to each of them individually when I can. I’m sorry I can’t come in here and answer questions right away and “give back to the community” in every which way possible that you wish. Everything I do regarding this blog is giving back – sometimes you just don’t see it happening because it’s a private conversation.

Some of the questions on this post have been addressed already in the comment stream, and a lot of times other people have been kind enough to answer so I give it some time usually (Big thanks Steve and Joseph, and several others too).

Yes, I still use UAW, because it’s still working for my new niche sites.

For the spammer button – there would be hundreds more spam comments a day coming from bots, so the current one is doing it’s job on non-human spam comments, and again I do my best to come in here and delete the ones that are human. Do you have a link to the adopters video?

No worries about the rant, Tom. I appreciate your honestly and truly value it. Merry Christmas to you and yours!

Chris December 29, 2011 at 8:33 pm

Reply

That comment was from last year, so not applicable.

James Hussey January 7, 2012 at 12:34 pm

Reply

One of my favorite aspects about your blog, Pat, is the way you magnanimously handle hot heads. WTG

And FWIW – yes, UAW still works just fine, though there are other tools out there, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Cody Sellers January 22, 2012 at 10:08 pm

Reply

Not trying to disagree with you just to disagree, but your comment of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” is not the best method to take with Google.

When it comes to building backlinks I would recommend using multiple sources because one simple algorithm update can devalue every link that is built with a network, such as UAW.

There are lots of factors that go into ranking a site, but backlinks are certainly a big factor (if not the biggest.) Therefore, I would recommend using services other than just UAW. This way, in the event that Google completely wipes out the value of the UAW network, you have links coming from other sources.

Dave February 1, 2012 at 12:38 pm

Reply

Well said Cody and I couldn’t agree more.

It is very easy to use just one service or one link building method but easy is not the way to go. From what I learned over the past year about SEO (and I ranked a few keywords) is that there are 2 things about link building you must follow:

Link Diversity and Link Velocity.

Get links from multiple sources and be sure to get links all the time rather than in spikes (1000 today, nothing in the next few days).

I am a big fan of UAW and used it for a long time and it was the best at one point but right now, I find ArticleRanks to be the best blog network and the great thing about it is that you can actually use if for free if you add your own domains.

Steve Wyman February 1, 2012 at 12:48 pm

Reply

Hi Dave and Cody

Fellow travelers on the SEO highway. Indeed they are two of the major factors for sure

With Link diversity I would break that into two part

Link SOURCE Diversity
Link ANCHOR TEXT diversity

Arguable which is most important but they are key.

regards

Chris March 30, 2012 at 7:24 pm

Reply

I would be careful with Article Ranks. I used it exclusively as my blog network and the blogs associated with A.R. are being de-indexed at a high rate. I’m currently loosing 5-10% of my links everyday since Google’s latest Panda update. I can’t build links fast enough to make up for the losses. What’s the point of spending all your time building links to your web 2.0 sites if they are going to be slapped by Google? Just seems like a wast of time.

Dave February 1, 2012 at 1:51 pm

Reply

Hi Steve,

I personally think that link source diversity is more important. That is just what I seen from my own link building. I know that many say that anchor text diversity is key but I never really diversified my anchor text much and it didn’t prevent me from getting top rankings.

Ampit February 27, 2012 at 10:29 am

Reply

Completely Agree Steve.

Steve Wyman February 10, 2012 at 8:53 am

Reply

Hey Dave

Im pretty much sure that link anchor text diversity is now a big factor. Googlebot with Panda updates is definetly showing bias against exact match anchor text at 70%+

As always in some niches you can do any backlinking and rank well but for longer term stability I believe total diversity will be a good idea. Its fairly easy to do as well so a good practice.

regards

Dror February 21, 2012 at 4:20 am

Reply

I agree Steve.

The bottom line is that it can’t hurt to diversify your anchor text and it doesn’t require more work since it is fairly easy to do as you mentioned so there is really no reason not to do it.

Carl from Small Scale Business February 23, 2012 at 9:17 am

Reply

Is there a tool for me to know if my exact match anchor text is at 70%+ ? Thanks!

robert April 14, 2012 at 10:45 am

Reply

i dont remember but i will get back to you

Leave a Reply

 Please send me your free eBook, eBooks The Smart Way!