This backlinking strategy is modeled after Joseph Archibald’s strategy he generously shared free to the public in his 40 Day Challenge on the Warrior Forum. He was able to rank a fairly competitive niche in the top 5 in Google within 40 days.
(For everyone’s convenience, he has also sinsce published The 40 Day Challenge eBook, which is a lot easier to read than the 1200+ posts on the Warrior Forum. Check out his sample chapter here.)
He’s taken it upon himself to be totally active here on SPI and respond to everyone’s questions and concerns about the backlinking strategy on my blog, which just shows what kind of guy he is. If you use this strategy, be sure to thank Joseph sometime.
***Note: This strategy still works even after Google’s latest Panda Update.
I’ve revealed my niche site backlinking strategy before, but never in this much detail.
Ever since the niche site I created for the Niche Site Duel started to rapidly climb the ranks of Google, eventually landing on the number one position, people have been asking me for more detail about my strategy and the software and tools that I’ve been using to help.
There are several strategies one can use to rank higher in the search engines and the one I’m going to explain is just one of them.
Please note that links to software and tools within this blog post are affiliate links which I do receive financial gain from if purchases are made from them.
Furthermore, the principles of this strategy can be done for absolutely free without having to buy any software or tools. I use the software to help and speed things up.
Don’t spend money on anything you see online unless you can afford it and you feel it will pay you back in the future.
Overview
I’d like to start by sharing an overview of the process with you so you can see how it all works as a whole. Later in this post, I’ll get into detail about the individual parts.
(Click to watch Backlinking Strategy & Process Overview on YouTube)
To summarize what I talk about in the video, the backlinking strategy I’m using involves two layers of backlinks – the anchor layer, which are links that you create which link directly to your niche site, and the indirect layer, which are links that you create which link directly to your anchor layer.
The Anchor Layer
The anchor layer consists of a few parts, again, which link directly to your niche site.
These include:
- Top Article Directory Submissions
- New Blogs
- Web 2.0 Properties
Links from Blog Blueprint(Blog Blueprint hasn’t been performing as well as it used to. It’s not vital if this part of the strategy is taken out)- Updated 12/03/11 - Direct Links from BuildMyRank (BMR is a BB replacement that has been working much much better for my sites lately! You get 10 links for free, so try it out! Most of the other niche site creators I know use BMR now as well as a primary link resource.)
Later in this post when I talk about how this all happens, I’ll get into what exactly is involved with each of these 4 parts in the anchor layer – what directories I submit to, what “new blogs” is, etc.
The Indirect Layer
The indirect layer is a way to create massive amounts of backlinks which link directly to the anchor properties we setup in the anchor layer. These links do not point directly to your niche site.
The indirect layer consists of:
- Mass Article Submissions using Unique Article Wizard
- Mass Bookmarking Submissions
The reason that you don’t want to link directly to your niche site is because you’re creating hundreds of backlinks at a time and if you point all of them to your niche site, it will look totally unnatural and your young site won’t be able to handle all of it without raising a red flag. When you point these links to your anchors, because your anchor sites are on high ranking, totally populated websites, they’ll be able to handle the wave/influx of links but at the same time pass or feed that SEO power generated from all of those links into your niche site. Your anchor properties act as a shield while at the same time allow you to get the SEO benefit from the indirect layer.
Yes, I know – it sounds kind of wacky. When I first heard this strategy it really didn’t make sense to me, but after implementing the strategies myself the results are very clear.
The Streamlined Process
Now that you have a general understanding of the what, I’m going to show you the how.
I think the best way to do this is to actually just walk you through the process from start to finish and show you how I can create all of these backlinks from a single unique article.
Step 1: Write an Original Article Related to Your Niche
Everything in this process begins with writing an original article. Personally, I like to have full control of what’s written and what’s published, so I like to write the articles myself, but there are many people who are comfortable with having a virtual assistant or ghostwriter write the article for them instead.
Either way, it should definitely unique content and should typically be around 350-600 words in length. Although the length isn’t extremely important, it’s smart to stay within this range because it will make your life easier in the later steps of this process.
Lastly, you can choose to post this original article onto your niche site before you move on to the next steps. You could kill two birds with one stone by adding content to your site and following the next steps to help build backlinks as well.
Step 2: Prepare The Article for Spinning
Like I mentioned in the overview video above, spinning an article gives you the ability to quickly create multiple variations of an original article so that you can submit them to various places without worrying about duplicate content penalties and so that you can save tons of time by not having to create brand new content from scratch over and over again to get the same message across.
I talked about article spinning in my previous backlinking post and naturally a lot of people commented about it (currently 174 comments) because it is a widely debatable topic.
Not everyone is comfortable with the idea of spinning an article – using multiple variations of an original article and then submitting those variations to several different locations on the web. Some people view it as spammy and others view it as dangerous too. I totally respect that side of the argument, but let me tell you why I think it’s okay.
(I don’t want this post to turn into some huge debate, but I feel I should tell you why I am okay with this method since this is what I’m showing you how to do.)
First, I don’t view it as spammy because I’m making sure that the content that I submit (even after spinning) is good. Since they are quality articles and I don’t submit different versions of an article to the same location, I feel comfortable knowing that I’m doing what I can to make sure my message gets read in the most places as possible, without using the same exact text over and over again.
Also, think about press releases for a second. Press releases are one single version of an article that gets syndicated to tens of thousands of places on the web. Companies like PRWeb make money doing this for other companies, brands and people. As described on PRWeb’s site:
“We send your news to 35,000 journalists and bloggers, 30,000 websites and hundreds of newspapers including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune as well as local news outlets across the USA. PRWeb gets your story where it needs to go.”
Several brand name companies and individuals use press releases (the exact same article, not variations) to help spread the word about something. This is exactly what I’m doing when I submit my spun content to various places on the web, although I’m taking it a step further and am not using the same exact content over and over again. I’m using different variations because that’s the only way I can make it happen, at least without penalty.
In my previous post, I think Mark Mason’s comment says it best:
“I hate this spinning discussion. Let’s say Pat has the cure for cancer and he posts it on his blog. Curing cancer is good. So Pat spins articles about curing cancer and posts them everywhere so he can help the most people while playing by the rules that GOOGLE has set.
So what about security guards? Pat’s site rocks. It will help people that are thinking about becoming a security guard. Security guards are a help to society. It’s all good.
So what if Pat “advertises” his site by placing similar content all over the web? It’s not like the web is “full” and Pat is harming someone by taking up too much space.
It seems acceptable for Toyota to place the same add on every TV network and run it over and over. It’s OK for AP to syndicate their content everywhere. Why not Pat.
Not to mention the fact that Pat is only doing this because Google’s algorithms are too poor to tell good content from bad content. I would argue that if Pat Does not do something to rank his site, he is being unfair to all those readers out therebat NEED him but cannot find him.
Failing to properly promote your site when there are people to help profitably is A lot bigger sin than syndicating 47 very similar but different copies of a good article.
If you want to take a stand against someone, get mad at Google. They have an inferior product that relies on backlinks — yet they make Billions of dollars each year from it. That’s the problem, not Pat.
Anyways, I think we’ve beat this to a pulp already – it’s time to show you how it’s done.
In the video below, you’ll see me using a piece of software called The Best Spinner, which is by far the best spinning software available with the biggest bank of user generated synonyms that make the spinning process much faster.
Although there is a “one-button” approach that you can use to spin your articles, I would advise against using that feature because although The Best Spinner is awesome, it’s automated functions aren’t entirely perfect. You’ll see that I take the time to go through each word one-by-one to plug in good synonyms that make sense. Even though this takes some extra time (and like I said preparing an article for spinning is what takes up most of my time in this backlinking strategy), it’s totally worth it when you can just copy and paste spun versions of your articles in all of the later steps.
(Click to watch The Best Spinner – Article Spinning on YouTube)
Is article spinning absolutely necessary in order to make this strategy work. No! But as you will see, it does help to speed things up a bit.
Step 3: Submit to Article Directories
In this step, you’ll be submitting spun versions of your original article to various article marketing directories.
The directories I usually submit to are listed below:
You probably know that many of these top article directories check to make sure that the article is unique before approving and posting it onto their site. EzineArticles, especially, is notorious for this, however I’ve never once had an article denied approval or removed. If you are worried, you can still continue through this process by submitting a version to just one of the article directories.
EzineArticles is the top-choice directory, however it usually takes a while to get your articles approved (several days if you have not yet written 10 articles for their site). If you want an immediate approval, you can submit to GoArticles, which helps because then you don’t have to wait days to utilize the article in this backlinking process.
Here is one version of my article that I spun from the spinning video in step #2, live on GoArticles.com. Don’t forget to add a link directly to your niche site in the author bio / resource section, making sure you have at least one link that is an anchor text that matches your target keyword or keyphrase.
And yes, Pete Chamberlain is my pen name for my niche site and all related articles.
Step 4: Create Your New Blogs and Web 2.0 Properties
At this point you can use spun versions of your original article to create new blogs and web 2.0 properties that all have backlinks pointing to your site. They will be a part of the anchor layer that we talked about in the overview, which means they will contain links that point directly back to your niche site.
New Blogs and Web 2.0 Properties
These are new blogs and web 2.0 sites that you create for free, and the real benefit here is that they are a part of a larger, more powerful and higher ranking domain.
So for example, when you create a free blog at WordPress.com, even though the blog you create will start out as a Page Rank 0 (PR0) website, it’s still a part of the PR9 wordpress.com domain. This same ideology goes for all of the articles you’ve written for article directories too.
Each of the new sites will only require one post, which you can grab from a spun version of your original article (although you could and probably should add a little more (spun) content later – just to give the site more meat.
In addition to the content, you should embed a related video from YouTube (and even a picture too) just to make your page a little more relevant to the topic, and so it looks like it’s lived in a little.
Here is where you can create your free blogs and Web 2.0 Sites (thanks to Joseph for the updated list! - updated 2012):
- http://www.wordpress.com/
- http://www.tumblr.com/
- http://www.livejournal.com/
- http://www.blogger.com/
- http://youblog.net/
- http://myanimelist.net/
- http://www.barnculture.com/
- http://campusbug.com/
- http://www.nexopia.com/
- http://blog.com/
- http://www.migente.com/
- http://bravejournal.com/
- http://www.getjealous.com/
- http://xanga.com/
- http://www.thoughts.com/
- http://insanejournal.com/
- http://webs.com/
- http://www.blogcatalog.com/
- http://newsvine.com/
- http://www.geckogo.com/
- http://posterous.com/
Again, these only require 1 post (2 or 3 is better) with a link back to your niche site, and after that the only thing you have to do with them is remember the URL so you can link to them in the next step (step #5). I don’t do any cross linking between these sites.
Anchor Text Update for 2012: Also, make sure you vary your anchor text a bit. Meaning, the link from these sites that point back to your main site shouldn’t ALWAYS be using your main keyword. Why? Because it’s unnatural and a good variety of related anchor texts is better. So for example, if your target keyword is “Fly Fishing”, then it’s probably smart to use “Fly Fishing” about half the time (roughly) and then a mix of other keywords like “Fly Fishing Rods”, “Fly Fishing Reels”, “Fly Fishing Techniques”, “Fly Fishing Tips”, etc. for the other half.
Notable Web 2.0 Properties
There are two unique Web 2.0 sites I’d like to mention real quick:
They are free to setup and treated in the exact same manner as the New Blogs, they are just setup a little differently. You can use a (HIGHLY UNIQUE) spun version of your original article for some content, you can add an rss feed from your niche site, some videos, some pictures – there are a lot of cool things you can do with Squidoo and Hubpages. Again, just make sure there’s a least one backlink (with your keyword as the anchor text), pointing back to your niche site for each.
Note about Squidoo and Hubpages (and the reason why they’re separated out): More recently, they’ve been getting more and more strict with the content that is posted on their sites. I would actually write the content on these sites manually if possible, but if you don’t have the time you can test a spun version of your original article, knowing that it may not be approved. This is a warning for you just in case, just remember to think about the end user and what’s actually useful for them. The more “modules” and content you can add on those sites – the better, and the link that can come from those sites can be extremely powerful, if you can land ‘em.
After you have all of the above mentioned sites setup, you don’t need to keep creating more. When you get to this point, you can skip step #4 entirely because they will already be in place and doing their job.
Step 5: Indirect Linking to Your Anchor Sites
In this step, you’ll be creating a load of backlinks that link back to your anchor sites that you’ve created from your article submissions, your new blogs and web 2.0 properties.
Unique Article Wizard
Unique Article Wizard is a tool that I got familiar with a month after starting my niche site and it’s proving to work quite well. Previously, I’ve used Automatic Article Submitter to do mass article submissions, but UAW definitely outperforms AAS in my opinion, simply because I can get a lot more backlinks from it.
That being said, UAW isn’t entirely automatic either, but you can get up to 800-1000 backlinks form a single article, with links to prove it, which is awesome. This is why we use these articles to link to our anchor sites, because 1000s of backlinks to your niche site would definitely be a little much.
Here’s a video explaining how UAW works:
(Click to watch Unique Article Wizard – Massive Backlinks on YouTube)
Social Bookmarking
This is another method you can use to link directly to your anchor sites which will ultimately help boost the authority of your niche site.
There are several different backlinking tools available to help you with this process. One of them, Bookmarking Demon, automates the entire process but I’ve found the software to be really hard to handle, and it’s extremely expensive at $147 a pop. After purchasing it myself (again, I purchased and played around with all of these tools to see what works and what doesn’t so I could report back to you), personally I found that it wasn’t worth that much money to me.
I’d rather use a free tool from SocialMarker.com Social Poster, which really isn’t automated at all (and the initial time you run through it it takes a while because you have to manually sign up for all of the different social bookmarking sites), but it does save a little bit of time.
During my journey with my security guard training niche, social bookmarking was the thing I did the least. If I didn’t have unique article wizard on hand, I probably would have done more of it.
Step 6: Rinse and Repeat
Go back to Step 1.
An Important Final Note
So that’s the bulk of the backlinking strategy, and as you can see there are a lot of parts to it.
The thing is, most of the software and tools I’ve been talking about come with a cost, but I don’t want you to think that you need to purchase any of these things in order to succeed.
You can complete this entire backlinking strategy from the article submissions to the creation of new blogs and web 2.0 properties and social bookmarking without spending a dime. So please, don’t feel like you need to empty your wallet after reading this, I just wanted to show you exactly what I was doing and the tools I’ve been using to help save some time and speed things up a bit.
The tools work, but they aren’t necessary.
I know how much influence I have now that the Smart Passive Income Blog has grown so popular, and with that I accept the responsibility to make sure to never cheat you or tell you that you NEED to spend money on this or that in order to find success. When I created my first online business, the only thing I spent money on was a domain name and hosting package.
In the beginning, I didn’t spend money on a fancy website design, search engine optimization, article spinning software, submitter tools or anything like that. Heck, I didn’t even know those things existing and the only thing I did was publish great content, and I eventually gained a following and things just took off from there.
I am anticipating a number of questions or comments from this post, so please be patient for my response while I catch up on some sleep. It’s has been a long night putting all of this together for you, but I love it. If someone asks a question and you know the answer or have something to say, please don’t be shy.
Cheers!
Update: My buddy Eric over at My4HourWorkWeek.com created a really handy excel file to help you keep track of all of the link building and sites that you create for this specific backlinking strategy. Check it out here!
Other Posts in The Niche Site Duel Series
- Niche Site Duel: I’ve Been Challenged, and I Accept! (8/16)
- Niche Site Duel 002: Finding a Profitable Niche – My Process Revealed (8/18)
- Oops. The Niche I Selected is Bad, and Here’s Why (8/20)
- Niche Site Duel 003: How to Setup a Niche Site – Before You Add Content (8/25)
- Niche Site Duel 004: My Content Strategy (9/10)
- Niche Site Duel 005: My Backlinking Boo Boo (9/13)
- Niche Site Duel 006: My Backlinking Strategy (9/14)
- Niche Site Duel 007: Ranking and Traffic (and Earnings!) Update (9/29)
- Niche Site Duel 008: My Monetization Strategy (10/26)
- Niche Site Duel 009: I’m On The First Page of Google! (10/27)
- Niche Site Duel 010: I’m Ranked Number One in Google!! (11/8)
- Niche Site Duel 011: THE Backlinking Strategy That Works (11/10)
- Niche Site Duel 012: An Experiment and Income Update (11/29)
- Niche Site Duel 013: CPA Promotions, Private Advertising, Job Board and Income Report(1/14)
- My 275% Increase in Adsense Revenue (1/26)
- Niche Site Earnings and Directory Listing Update (3/11)
- I Was Just Offered Five Figures For My Niche Site! (5/11)
- Niche Site Update – New Content, Record Earnings, and What’s Next (5/26)
- Niche Site Duel – One Year Later (Earnings and Traffic Update (8/15)
Download eBooks the Smart Way! Check out my FREE guide about publishing, marketing and automating a killer eBook! Just enter your name and email below... | ![]() |
![]() | We hate spam just as much as you |






Enter your name and email below to get Free Instant Access to the most comprehensive guide available on how to Publish, Market, and automate your own killer eBook.




{ 1453 comments (Click Here to Leave a Comment Below) }
← Older Comments
Great post that will help people get a bit of link generation. Forum posting is always an easy place to get a link! You can get into some very big forums and put your url in a signature box or in your quote area so every post will be a potential link!
Hey Pat, and helpful Moderators,
I’m new to blogging as I’ve been doing it for about a year (still learning new things) since I was 18, I’m now 19, and I would very much appreciate some quick help with this. Nothing too lengthy.
So I have every little concept down except one minor detail. I might be plain dumb, but it’s worth asking.
1) So with this entire process (steps 1-5) are we using ONE single article to submit to all the directories, web 2.0 blogs, and new blogs, and then rinsing and repeating with another completely different (not spun) article?
2) Secondly, if we are using one article, does that mean we are linking to every web 2.0 blog, new blog, and article directory with that one article through UAW?
3) Lastly, if the answer to question #1 was the second option, does that mean we’ll be submitting every new article we compose on our blog through UAW?
Here’s My Personal Process: Wondering If It’s Anything Close To The Right Way?
1) I personally create one high-quality article each day for my site
2) Spin it three different times
3) Submit it to 7 top article directories (Ezines, Article Base, etc.)
4) My resource box for article directories include an anchor link, made up of my targeted keyword for that article, as well as a second anchor link pointed to my homepage at my blog with it’s specific keyword
5) I submit those three spun versions through UAW, linking to one of my spun versions at EzineArticles as well as a second link pointing to the main post on my blog.
6) The article usually gets sent to roughly 250 directories every time (I’ve sent 30+ articles) which isn’t close to what Pat gets sent to
7) I do the same thing the next day for a different article
I guess my main question is am I doing it right and if not what can I do to fix this mess? Just trying to make this work good if I’m going to do it right, so I’m not wasting time. Right now it’s a few hours a day just to get this backlinking part of my fay down.
I appreciate ANY kinds of help with this. Thanks a bunch.
-Jason
Great post Pat.
One should not go aggressively when it comes to building backlinks, as at the end Google doesn’t want us to do that.
I suggest to start with very soft link building, then to raise that slowly, so it looks as natural as possible in the Google’s eyes.
WizIMS
Apparently, isnare is now $59.95/month if you want to use html!!!!???!?!! Is there a better directory to replace isnare or better to just skip it?
Hi
There are many directories you can replace it with try a goolge search. Or yes you can skip that as well.
regards
On creating blogs.
Let’s say that I have a website around fly fishing in general. And I’ve already created blogs around the keyword fly fishing. But now I want to target keywords like salt water fly fishing and fresh water fly fishing and fly fishing for bass, etc…. do I need to create new blogs for those keywords? Or can I filter all the UAW articles through the blogs that I’ve already created to target the keyword, fly fishing?
But say I wanted to target keywords such as boats, fillet knife, smoker, etc…. Keywords that don’t say fly fishing, then I am assuming I would definately want to create new blogs for those keywords? And if I targeted those keywords then I would also want to put the targeted keyword into the blog site web address right?
I’m slowly figuring this out, but I think I still need help. It’s all new to me and I barely began learning about it two weeks ago, so thank you for helping me out here.
“But now I want to target keywords like salt water fly fishing and fresh water fly fishing and fly fishing for bass, etc…. do I need to create new blogs for those keywords?” – Yes
“Or can I filter all the UAW articles through the blogs that I’ve already created to target the keyword, fly fishing?” – No
“But say I wanted to target keywords such as boats, fillet knife, smoker, etc…. Keywords that don’t say fly fishing, then I am assuming I would definately want to create new blogs for those keywords?” – Yes
“And if I targeted those keywords then I would also want to put the targeted keyword into the blog site web address right?” – Yes
HOWEVER you have two other choices at least
1) add the additional keywords (especially when related) as new POSTs to the existing anchor layer blogs and aim the UAW at these and then these down to the money site.
2) Dont just use this as the only backlinking method. You can use things like social bookmarking, forumn profile links direct etc etc. espcially once the main site is ranking and has a good number of links to it.
Just be carefull to vary anchor text, avoid using just the target kewyord and not to blast the main site.
regards
@Steve Wyman
You seem very helpful with this topic and so interactive here so I was wondering if you could answer my question in the above? Used a wrong email address so no gravatar but this is my profile. Please help at all.
Thanks, Jason
Very interesting article, and a good strategy for backlinks. It would take a bit of time to do it but no pain, or hard work, and no gain.
Thanks for the good and useful article. Have a great day!
Pat, I have been reading all your posts for the past 3 weeks and is still a bit skeptical whether I need to invest time and (some money) by following the techniques that worked for you. You see, I am starting to doubt now whether SEO is still important following what Google Panda has been doing in my older sites. Could you enlighten me, based on your theory and opinion, whether your backlinking techniques will still be applicable starting today Feb 14 and forward? Thanks.
I am still using these techniques, as are many others here who are posting their results and findings. SEO is still important – it always will be, it’s just forever changing and all of here are doing our best to keep up with the changes, and I’ve updated this document accordingly based on what is working and what’s not working anymore. Did you use these techniques in your older sites, or something different?
Thanks Pat for an awesome and fast reply. Now, I just started the few steps you outlined here where I am now using UAWizard. I signed up a few hours ago and submitted my very first article which will point to my unique article in GoArticles which will point to my main website (hehe, I am finding your layered backlinking quite sensible).
No, I haven’t used your techniques in my older sites (2009) since I want to try your technique in a very new domain and would gladly share if I can replicate your success in 2-3 months. Like what I said, I just started having a unique article in Amazines, Squidoo and GoArticles. Today, I started using UAWizard to point to GoArticles for the mean time and tomorrow on other directories. I haven’t purchased the Best Spinner yet due to limited budget so I spun one article by myself
Hi Rian, the thing about the SEO world is that it is very dynamic and constantly changing. With that said, the basics are still the same and instead of focusing on the exact tools Pat has mentioned he is using, try to grasp the overall concept as that is the more important thing to learn and master.
When I decided to stop worrying about what Google might do in the future I started to see real results. It really doesn’t do any good to worry about things that are not under your control.
If you suffered from Panda then you need to learn what you did wrong on your older sites and revise your link building strategy for you new sites. Giving up is never the answer and i’m sure that if you will follow the strategies mentioned here (with some tweaks) you will get the success you are looking for.
The best advise I can give you is to test as you go. That is how I learned SEO and I am still learning (I doubt I will ever stop…)
Dror,
I very much agree with you that there is no way we can read the minds of these search engines, this is the depressing part. I got traumatized with the Panda when one of my websites dropped down to the abyss back in October last year. That time I lost my faith with SEO, and thought “well there is really nothing I can do about this no matter what SEO techs I do”. Traditionally, I benefited from conservative and slow backlinking like commenting and bookmarking. I ranked first in some keywords but not as successful as Pat.
You can’t lose faith when it comes to SEO. Changes will always take place and sooner or later they will get to everyone. I only recently got smacked by Google on a few sites but I don’t let that discourage me from doing what i’m doing.
I can recommend that you build a number of sites so you don’t put all of your eggs in one basket. This way, when and if a site will be penalized it won’t hurt so much.
Hi
I have a slightly different take.
Theres no need to be negative about SEO or Google. You can read the minds of the engine but it takes a lot of work and study.
Plus you have to know who to trust and who to study. There are always techniques that are not discussed generally taht become known when you read a lot.
For example theres a string trend towards using no more than 10-25% of your anchor text as the exacth match to your target keyword for a given URL with maybe as much as 15% junk links such as click here etc..
This is an absolutely awesome blog post that I will be sharing with my followers. You could have charged a lot of money for this content! Absolutely brilliant job.
One thing I wanted to point out was in regards to the list of Article Directories. Someone above mentioned that iSnare now charges $59.95/month and wanted to know if there was a replacement. A good article site that I seem to find coming up in Google searches all of the time is ArticlesBase.com. They are one of the best and the approval process is much faster than EzineArticles.com.
Again, this is a well laid out strategy.
Hi Steve & Dave,
Nice little debate you’s have going on, hope you don’t mind me sticking in my 2 cents. Am a firm believer in complete diversity, in both Anchor Text & Source. But I guess its up to everyone to find what works well for them, so Your Both Right.
Just love SmartPassiveIncome.com, please keep up the good work.
Hi David
Its not a close forumn
I wish more folks would comment and contribute to these kind of threads.
Im definetly in to complete diversity. More and more createing a cloud cover of diverse links with just a small part of that being the target kewyord is also becoming much more important.
regards
having good stuff.
Another great place to publish articles is http://www.yourarticle.co.uk
Has anyone else had similar success with this method? What type of results have you seen?
A question for you fantastic contributors,
When trying to rank for one specific keyword how many anchor sites do you typically recommend? For example, this is my anchor layer so far..
- 2 Squidoos
- 3 Blogspots
- 5 wordpress
- 2 Posterous
- 2 Go articles
- 3 blog.coms
- 2 webs
- 2 thoughts.com
- and a partridge, in a pear tree
Is this sufficient for one keyword in a smaller niche? Can I start devoting all of my time to backlinks for these sites or should one always be increasing their anchor layer, at least a bit? Any input would be handsomely rewarded, with rum. Probably. Thank you Jo and Pat for this mind-blowingly awesome strategy.
Hi
Unfortunately theres no way to recommend how many you’ll need. Every keyword phrase has different exact match compettion and they all have different levels of backlinks themselves.
I would start with one of each unless your own experiences says otherwise.
Remeber each anchor iste member only provide the money site with 1 links from 1 domain. So if you in a niche such as Insurance you’ll never get to page one using this technique alone. You would simply need far to many domains.
I use Market samuri SEOcomp to get an idea of the number of root domains the compettion has as a guide. Spencer Haws at NichePursuits.com has got some great guidance onthat area. Although he’s typically targetting very low comp keywords.
For some reason, Google is making the searches “relative” now compared to being “fixed and absolute” a few years ago. Your search results today gives you suggestions from Google+, +1′s by friends and stuff like that. And not too many people are like internet marketers who would know how to turn off these personalized functions of Google… Google’s inventions are making some of my backlinking efforts fruitless if they do no appear anyway…
Hi
That not quite right. Google has never tried to return fixed results.
Nor relative but they. Try to return relevant and authorative results for the individuals request.
They are laser focus on customer as matt cutts has said many times. What they are trying to do now is influence your search result by you own behaviour bu those recomendations from friends
flawed it maybe be just a new challenge for seo which is ofcourse of no concern to google
Questions on the resource boxes-
1. In the example, Pat showed a resource box that linked to 2 of his direct anchor sites. Shouldn’t we be creating several anchor sites and linking the UAW articles to each of them? (i.e. I have 6 articles submitted to article directories and 3 web 2.0 properties). If so, how do we do this with the resource box section?
2. The UAW instructional video says we should create at least 50 variations of resource boxes, but Pat says “2-4″. Which is correct?
Hi Kevin
1/ In a single UAW submission you can only link to 2 URL’s so to cover your multiple anchor layes URL you will need multiple UAW.
10 anchor layer site = minimum of 5 UAW
2/ Not watch UAW video for a long time. 4-5 is fine. Although more is always better.
Bear in mind that what Pat’s (based on Jo’s 40 day challnge) doing his is quick and fast volume backing to the anchor layer. Were not linking to the money site. If we were then you would want more varations. A whole lot more now post panda.
But in this strategy its not so important when blasting the anchor layer.
Asive siad elsewhere the anchor layer is scrafical. the money site is not.
regards
ALSO IF your reading this its very worth while readin Pat’s update on anchor text varations. I;d go further and say exact match anchor text should be near 30% or as low as 10% now. with 30-40% random links such as “click here” “more info” tc make it look natural.
Thanks Steve. So what you’re saying is, to flood links to the anchor layer sites, I would have to spin the same article using UAW a total of 5 times to cover all 10 of my anchor sites? This part is really confusing to me. It seems far more time consuming than I imagined at first! Since I’m not using The Best Spinner, creating all these different spun versions is kind of a nightmare to do manually.
Hi
Yep its painfull if you dont have some of the tools. But no point in buying tools until your making progress the classic catch 22.
Like some blog networks that cost $500 a month for 5 URls! it works but heck.
Anyway back to your question. The best Spinner is a great investment if your in this for the medium term. http://www.smartpassiveincome.com/resources/ theres a link at ethe bottom of the resources page.
If your not fully commited the a good alternative is to buy an Ultra spinnable articles form theleadingarticles.com You can use that same article over and over again (100′s of times at least) so get one relevant to the niche you money site is in and use it to backlink to the anchor layer. I use the marketplace not the subscription option. Thats way you can buy when you need them
regards
Thanks, good article, as usual. I completely like the idea of Jason with his personal process. Of course I am also agreeing that you need to spend money if you need to get a good ROI, this is maybe something we all need to understand in the online businesses. Right?
I have been using UAW recently to help boost my Wizzley and Infobarrel posts. Unfortunately, it is typically only giving me about 100 backlinks per post.
At the end of my most recent backlinking campaign I submitted the list of URLs that UAW provided to the Backlink Indexer to see if the extra “juice” helped. It turned out that of 107 backlinks, only 27 were active, 24 hours after finishing a run.
However, after running Backlink Indexer on my UAW articles, my Wizzley page did move up. I’m just watching and wondering if we will need to come up with a replacement idea for UAW soon?
good post and video
building back link to your back links does of course make sense but does usually take a lot longer to build unless you either outsource it or use software
as steve says above that google may be not paying as much attention to exact match anchor text links anymore
what i tend to do is build links how they would get built naturally and that is lots of variations being used, long tail and short tail with even some click here links to change things up some what
good post though pat
paul
Hi Paul,
No thats not what im saying Im sorry if i confused an issue.
Google is not very much looking at Exact Match Domain Keyword targetting or excessive focus on one keyword on a url.
So they would appear to be “flaging” url’s or site where 905+ is the exacth match to the domain.
The reasoning may well be that its unnatural and an indication of link bulding activities.
So we now need to dramatically reduce this practice somewhere to 10%-30% exatch match is ok. then the balance split between related pharse (i..e. long tail variants of the keyword we are targetting) and “junk” such as click here, more info.
THOSE arnt rules and 90%+ still works but for how long? There basd on reading studying and some tetsing.
To see how this happens in the real world (outside of SEO there is one!) use market samuri SEO comp and look at the anchor text that exists on the top ten competitors in a competative (or your own) niche. You’ll see humans are very unclean inthe way they create bookmarks/anchor text to pages.
Hop ethat helps
Hey, this is indeed a great post. I just had a customer asking me If I could apply your strategy for his new website.
So, I came here to check out if it was a safe/good one and all I have to say “Congratulations”, excellent work.
For the last two step on your path, I would suggest making sure every backlink you have created is found and indexed by the search engines. To ensure that, you can create rss feeds containing all your backlinks and submit them to rss feed directories (You can also ping these rss feeds if you want to make sure of the indexing).
It is also worth mentioning that I was already using some of your methods to create backlinks for our sites
and that is the reason why our site is on the 1st position of the main search engines for many highly competitive and relevant keywords.
By the way, you recommend social bookmarks as one of the backlink building methods…
Please do not spend one more cent on this task until you have seen my prices. No software can beat our quality work and prices.
Hi,
This is very impressive and while I was reading and watching the video I really evaluate my self to do some kind of studies of backlinks like this.
Pat, fantastic resource, thanks for sharing it with us.
Joseph, love the strategy and I bought your ebook a couple of months ago on Pats recommendation. I am however struggling with one thing – the concept of ‘link juice’, I am open to correction but in my mind building many links to an anchor layer article will create higher PR for that article and therefore you get a higher PR link back to your site. Now if BMR gets links up to PR 5 why go to all the trouble building and linking to your own anchor layer when one good BMR link back to the niche site would achieve the same power. I sense I have missed the point and perhaps there is more to ‘link juice’ than just PR.
Many thanks
Hey Pat,
I have been following your blog for about a year now and post comments to some of your blog posts. I would like to know why you treat my comments as spam? I like to feel as though I have contributed in a constructive manor and I have spread your blog around many forums and places online for you.
Best,
Dave
Hey Dave
Im not speaking for Pat in anyway way shape or form.
Ive seen you comments before and might have replied to o or two not sure. But i definitively remember you.
What ive personally found is Pat lets pretty much anybody comment on this thread including those spamming for there own advantage (IMHO).
So my guess is you could be victim of the spam filter!! I got hit by it and ive been commenting for around a year on this blog.
If you change a detail of you email or web that can get he spam filter grabbing you.
Just the other day around 5 of my comments burst out of the spam filter ! I guess Pat had found them when he reviewed it which he does.
Just a comforting word or two is all.
regards
There is no doubt about the importance of building backlinks in the success of your website.
I asked quite a few important questions to Kristi Hines on how to build quality back links and she answered all the questions really well, which I think will help you guys to understand this topic in more detail.
Here is a link to this post.
http://www.ranashahbaz.com/high-pr-backlinks
Remember there are plenty of important factors to keep in mind when building links.
Hope this will help
Hi Rana
This is MY opinion not anybody else’s.
I think a better contribution to the thread would be for you to summarise the article here rather than do a direct link out to you own blog (which is excellent btw again IMHO)
I could for every question asked here say
“sure heres the link to my site with all the answers”
But i don’t think that would be as of much use to reader. Nor good for the PR juice of pats blog. We do of course use the website field for link creation.
The main reason i say this is i had to go to your blog then to krisits blog (which i had already read she is good) to view the article.
But then back here to comment.
The article is excellent and some solid points made. Some of them are incorrect of course as they are written from a blogging perspective and not and SEO perspective.
For example “crappy links” such as Fiverr Gigs for $5 are not at all crappy if you a) know which gigs to use (only a very few) and your creating intentionally a Cloud Cover to high the main target keywords your creating.
UAW (article marketing) is an outstanding tool used by such Niche experts as Spencer haws at Niche Pursuits .com I dont know why Kristi dis likes it.
regards
regards
Hi Pat,
I have read many times this article and saw again and again the videos just to understand better the whole process. I am new to this field and I want to learn and do things well because I am really passionate with that.
I have a question about
Step 4: Create Your New Blogs and Web 2.0 Properties
What about the url we choose to create the new blogs and web 2.0 properties? Does the url name really matter or just the anchor text we put in each article in each one one these blogs and properties?
Thank you for the answer. I really appreciate your help.
Lenia
I like Joseph approach for domain variations. I also like the idea to use no follow links to complement any SEO Strategy. This can be helpful in the long run and I agree that it is more important that what people believe.
Sorry again, I forgot to comment that is why it is important to pay special attention to the internal link building strategy, as well.
I find that when submitting my articles to directories at a lower rate using UAW, i.e. 50 instead of 350, I am getting more articles approved. Is anyone else noticing this?
Thanks everyone who has shared advice. I read every day.
Kevin
Hey Kevin,
Yes, I notice exactly that! I’ve submitted 30+ articles now with my first batch getting submitted to about 150 and only getting accepted by a few. I played around with some categories and keywords hoping to get submitted to a larger variety of sites with certain articles, but that didn’t do the trick either.
However, once I changed the daily submission rate from 300 back down to 40, my results doubled. So yes, submitting your articles at a slower, moderate rate will definitely get your article submitted to more sites and indexed better.
I’m still playing around with more keywords and categories to get my Fitness blog articles submitted to more sites, but I’m hoping to get to the point of maybe 400-500 sites once I find that secret set of keywords and categories for my niche. Hope that helps man.
God Bless,
Jason
Pay $5 and use fiverr.com and search social bookmark instead of wasting time using social poster. You get a report of all the links and the dude RSS them for pinging..
Hi Ian, so basically you are saying that you may add in spun links in your UAW bios so that these are chosen at random as the articles are submitted? Kinda like this for example:
best cat food|top cat food|best quality cat food…
This way is very effective, yes. Its entirely up to you how you go about this process Ian – you’ll get similar results no matter which method you choose to work with.
Regards
Joseph
Thanks for replying again Jo. Your answer helps loads. Can I ask another question please? Since attempting to increase my website rank my site has been jumping all over SERPs for my targetted keywords. One day I’m at number 5, a week later I go to 235, then back to 40, then down again etc etc – is this normal? When will it even out?
) to measure my rank and instead of using blog blurpint Im using BuildMyRank that is trickling out 1-3 articles a day using about 5 different Keywords – each KW targetting a separate page of my site.
I’m using Market samurai (bought through your link pat
Thanks once more for the guidance
Confused – Ian
Hi Ian, that’s a hell of a lot of dancing!
Build My Rank is my preference over Blog Blueprint so you’re ahead of the game there Ian! BB is good, but BMR that little better in some ways, but not necessarily suited to everyone by any means – BB is much less laborious, unless of course you are outsourcing the BMR content creation.
And a note to anyone who wants to sign up for BMR now – its just risen in price from $59 a month to a whopping $129 a month, so you would have to be seriously committed to using it religiously or its money down the drain in my opinion.
To get back to the agenda however – have you been using UAW in tandem with BMR, and if so, how many UAW articles are you submitting each day to this particular site?
Or – is this dance caused purely by the BMR links – have you been utilizing any other form of linking recently?
Regards
Joseph
Hi Jo
The dancing seems to be caused by BMR as I have only just started with this strategy outlined by Pat in this article (your originally I think?) I have only just started using UAW and I’m only targetting the anchor layer – as per instructions. The dancing is wierd. A couple of days ago I was fith for a keyword in google, now I’m somewhere at the bottom of page 3! Go figure! Is this normal?
Hi Ian, this dancing is not toally unuusual if its the first set of links to the site. But because these sort of links are powerful – both BMR and BB links can have your site dancing dramatically or even sandboxed, merely from a few links here and there. That is somewhat dependent on the website content too, I would tend to believe, and not just about the actual backlinks.
I sense that you are gonna have to ride with the waves here Ian. So keep on keepin’ on and hopefully it will settle in the short term rather than the longer term. In fact, I like the sound of that – being 5th and now at the bottom of page 3. If I saw my webpages dancing like this I’d be excited because it sounds like you are gonna come back higher up than 5th. Personally I love to dance with Google, but occasionally that dance never stops. Let’s hope that the dance your having with them is merely temporary.
Regards
Joseph
Thanks so much for the help with this Joseph, I’m hoping that using BMR and the strategy so brilliantly laid out here by Pat will slow the dance down and get me to no.1 for my keywords! You have both been very helpful and I appreciate it tremendously – thanks
Hi Ian, yup – Pat did a super job of laying out the strategy in a much more brief format than my own efforts on the Warrior Forum, lol!
If this does not get your chosen kwd phrases to top spot in Google, then you will be very close – no doubt about it (depending on your choice in kwds of course – real high end niches are simply too competitive these days and it would take many months, if not years to be competing in those niches).
Best wishes with this Ian!
Regards
Joseph
Just found that BMR is currently closed for new members. Looks like the significant price increase was not enough to stem the flow of new customers!
Hey Rob, perhaps you should open up commenting on your blog(?). I was going to leave a comment on your fine post.
Best wishes with your progress!
Joseph
Thanks for the initial process however! This is a guide I will come back to again and again.
Hey Jo
Does that mean you going to do a new addition of your eBook that this is all based on anyway
theres a lot missing rom this run through thats in the original WSo and you ebook.
Hence so many questions
great work Jo
Steve
Hi Joseph.
I’m wondering what do you think about 2 things:
- phrase match anchor text – meaning that backlinks to site contain not only our main KW but also some part of backlinks contant also phrases like “click here”
- do you think that having also NO-follow links have impact on rankings?
Regards
Kris
Just an update to Brad’s post … They are accepting new members again!
Blake
I agree with U… I need to know the same thing
Hi Kris Pashek, I do apologise as I never saw your comment and never realized it was directed at me. Nevertheless, better reply late than never at all, even though I’m a whole month late
1. I like the “click here” anchor text idea, and I also like the variations on website URL anchor text idea – these appear to be “natural” ways to bookmark a site, thus should be incorporated into a backlinking strategy. For variations on website URL I mean this sorta thing… Say your domain was http://ragdollcatsforsale.com
Variations would be…
http://ragdollcatsforsale.com
http://www.ragdollcatsforsale.com
http://www.ragdollcatsforsale.com
ragdollcatsforsale.com
I would always want to use No-Follow links in an SEO campaign. How much value they actually have in terms of aiding our rankings is debatable, but they are necessary to mix things up. Further, I sense they actually have more value than what most of us believe they do – in Google, in Bing and possibly in Yahoo too.
Kind regards
Joseph
$129? BMR’s pricing page still lists it as $59/month per 5 domains.
whats with the spammers providing no value and getting links in.
Isnt it about time you invested back into the community PAT thats if you even read this anymore.
It annoys me all these unanswered questions and spamming being allowed. Its making it more difficult to se whats happening in the thread.
So you still suport the use of UAW as a method build backlinks to the anchor layer !!! You have really found nothing better
If you can be bothered why not emplyee a VA its not like this blog cant afford it?
And whats with the spammer button when it doesnot stop spammers
theres a great video on first adopters that youd do well to look at. dont forget your first and second adopters
Sorry to rant but come on dude pull it up.. its your rep on the line.
Happy christmas and have a fantastic 2012
Tom, I’m taking a few days off to enjoy time with my family, so I apologize I haven’t been able to deal with these spammers right away. Every other time, I’ve come in here and deleted them right away.
I get upwards of 150+ emails a day from people, and I respond to each of them individually when I can. I’m sorry I can’t come in here and answer questions right away and “give back to the community” in every which way possible that you wish. Everything I do regarding this blog is giving back – sometimes you just don’t see it happening because it’s a private conversation.
Some of the questions on this post have been addressed already in the comment stream, and a lot of times other people have been kind enough to answer so I give it some time usually (Big thanks Steve and Joseph, and several others too).
Yes, I still use UAW, because it’s still working for my new niche sites.
For the spammer button – there would be hundreds more spam comments a day coming from bots, so the current one is doing it’s job on non-human spam comments, and again I do my best to come in here and delete the ones that are human. Do you have a link to the adopters video?
No worries about the rant, Tom. I appreciate your honestly and truly value it. Merry Christmas to you and yours!
That comment was from last year, so not applicable.
One of my favorite aspects about your blog, Pat, is the way you magnanimously handle hot heads. WTG
And FWIW – yes, UAW still works just fine, though there are other tools out there, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
Not trying to disagree with you just to disagree, but your comment of “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” is not the best method to take with Google.
When it comes to building backlinks I would recommend using multiple sources because one simple algorithm update can devalue every link that is built with a network, such as UAW.
There are lots of factors that go into ranking a site, but backlinks are certainly a big factor (if not the biggest.) Therefore, I would recommend using services other than just UAW. This way, in the event that Google completely wipes out the value of the UAW network, you have links coming from other sources.
Well said Cody and I couldn’t agree more.
It is very easy to use just one service or one link building method but easy is not the way to go. From what I learned over the past year about SEO (and I ranked a few keywords) is that there are 2 things about link building you must follow:
Link Diversity and Link Velocity.
Get links from multiple sources and be sure to get links all the time rather than in spikes (1000 today, nothing in the next few days).
I am a big fan of UAW and used it for a long time and it was the best at one point but right now, I find ArticleRanks to be the best blog network and the great thing about it is that you can actually use if for free if you add your own domains.
Hi Dave and Cody
Fellow travelers on the SEO highway. Indeed they are two of the major factors for sure
With Link diversity I would break that into two part
Link SOURCE Diversity
Link ANCHOR TEXT diversity
Arguable which is most important but they are key.
regards
Hi Steve,
I personally think that link source diversity is more important. That is just what I seen from my own link building. I know that many say that anchor text diversity is key but I never really diversified my anchor text much and it didn’t prevent me from getting top rankings.
Hey Dave
Im pretty much sure that link anchor text diversity is now a big factor. Googlebot with Panda updates is definetly showing bias against exact match anchor text at 70%+
As always in some niches you can do any backlinking and rank well but for longer term stability I believe total diversity will be a good idea. Its fairly easy to do as well so a good practice.
regards
I agree Steve.
The bottom line is that it can’t hurt to diversify your anchor text and it doesn’t require more work since it is fairly easy to do as you mentioned so there is really no reason not to do it.
← Older Comments